Sunday, March 6, 2016

LAURA AND JOHN ARNOLD FOUNDATION

“. . .  the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. According to its website, it concentrates on a handful of subjects, including education, criminal justice, "research integrity," "evidence-based policy and innovation," and "sustain- able public finance." On that last matter, the foundation says that it

works to promote fiscal sustainability and the effective oversight of public funds. We are funding efforts to help governments evaluate the impact of tax policies and design public pension systems that are affordable, sustainable, and secuAll of which sounds quite laudable. A little probing, however, shows that JohArnold for years worked at Enron, trading in natural gas derivatives. In 2001, he reportedly helped earn thcompany three quarters of a billion dollars, for which he received an $8 million bonus. When Enron collapsed, Arnold set up a hedge fund in Houston that specialized in natural gas trading. Ten years later, he was worth about $3 billion. In 2012, he retired from the fund and set up his foundation. Since then, Arnold has led a campaign to cut public employees' retirement benefits, making large contributions to politicians, Super PACs, ballot initiative efforts, and think tanks.
As part of that campaign, the Arnold Foundation gave $3.5 million to WNET, the public television station in New York, to support production of a two-year news series called The Pension Peril, to be shown on PBS. The foundation's involvement was not explicitly disclosed. In a February 2014 article for Pando, an online magazine covering Silicon Valley, David Sirota revealed Arnold's involvement and noted that the show (which had already begun airing) echoed many of the same pension-cutting themes that he was promoting in state legislatures. Amid growing pro-tests, PBS decided to return the grant and suspend the series, citing internal rules that deem the existence of a clear connection between the interests of a proposed funder and the subject matter of a program unacceptable. . . . .
On Inside Philanthropy, David Callahan noted that the Arnold/PBS case is hardly unique.”


Massing, Michael, ‘How to Cover the One Percent,’ The New York Review, January 14, 2016, pp: 74-76.