The poverty rate has been as low as 11.1
percent in the 1970s; it rose under Ronald Reagan to approximately 15 percent
and then fell to about 13 percent before rising again, then fell again under
Bill Clinton to 11.3 percent before rising in the 2000s.
This blog collects information about income inequality and places it – available to anyone interested – with alphabetical reference, on this specifically linked, Internet-accessible-and-searchable blog database, access to which is free and unrestricted. Search by keyword, i.e., Smith, poverty, using Microsoft Command f.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
POVERTY RATE IS HIGH NOW
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
SOME FALL BELOW POVERTY LINE SEASONALLY
Census Bureau measures tell us nothing useful about
the growing number of people whose average incomes are above the poverty line
but who often fall under it for several months of the year. According to one
sample, 94 percent of those who earn between 100 and 150
percent of the poverty line are officially poor for at least one month, for
example.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
Monday, April 3, 2017
FOR POOREST, INCOME GROWTH NEAR ZERO
“In recent years, trends in average living standards interacted with rising income inequality to produce stagnant
wages in the lower and middle income groups.
. . . since 2000, the decline in average income growth was further
exacerbated for the lowest income groups by a declining share of the total. So, for the
bottom
fifth,
the growth in real income declined from 3 percent . . . to essentially zero in the last fifteen
years. Of this catastrophic decline, about half was due to the slower overall
growth, while half was due to rising inequality.”
William D. Nordhaus, “Why Growth Will Fall, New York
Review of Books, August 18, 2016, page 66.
Friday, October 21, 2016
MULTI-MILLIONAIRE
SEES REVOLUTION COMING
Multi-millionaire
Nick Hanauer is no
dummy. He sees the writing on the wall.
“And what do
I see in our future now?
“I see pitchforks.
“At the
same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any
plutocrats in history, the rest of the country — the 99.99 percent — is lagging far behind. The divide between the haves and
have-nots is getting worse really, really fast. In 1980, the top one percent
controlled about 8 percent of U.S. national income. The bottom half shared
about 18 percent. Today, the top 1 percent [of the U.S. population] share about
20 percent; the bottom half, just 12 percent.
“But the
problem isn’t that we have inequality. Some inequality is intrinsic to
any high-functioning capitalist economy. The problem is that inequality is at
historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly
becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society. Unless our
policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be
back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.
“And so I have a
message for my fellow filthy rich, for all of us who live in our gated bubble
worlds: Wake up, people. It won’t last.
“No society
can sustain this kind of rising inequality. In fact, there is no example in
human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didn’t
eventually come out. You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you
a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counter-examples. None. It’s not
if, it’s when.
Nick Hanauer, “The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us
Plutocrats,” Politico Magazine "The pitchforks are coming . . . for us
Plutocrats"
Saturday, September 3, 2016
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS
One-percenters like Boeing, Northrup-Grumman, and Lockeed Martin have charged the government billons of dollars for post-911 safety projects. Read Steven Brill’s deeply incisive article in the September 2016 issue of The Atlantic magazine at http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/backissues/ page 61.
Steven Brill, “Are We Any Safer?” The Atlantic, September 2016.
Saturday, July 23, 2016
PEW
SURVEY SHOWS NEAR-UNIVERSAL INCOME LOSSES
Households in all
economic tiers experienced near-universal decreases in median incomes across
U.S. metropolitan areas, according to the independent Pew Foundation’s Research
Center. Middle-income households lost
ground financially in 222 of 229 metropolitan areas from 1999 to 2014.
Meanwhile, those in the lower-income tier saw their median income slip in 221
areas and those in the upper-income households took a financial hit in 215
areas.
Pew
Research Center 2014 American Community Survey
MIDWEST HAS TOP 10 MIDDLE-CLASS AREAS
The 10 metropolitan
areas with the greatest shares of middle-income adults are located mostly in
the Midwest, according to the independent Pew Foundation’s Research Center.
Metropolitan areas with the largest upper-income shares are
mostly in the Northeast or on the California coast, while the 10 metropolitan areas with the biggest
lower-income tiers are in the southwest, several on the border with Mexico.
Pew
Research Center 2014 American Community Survey
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)