Government measures of poverty in America tell
us nothing about the long-term psychological effects of low incomes and rising inequality, which are
undermining the belief that hard work pays off. Scholars have found a measurable
relationship between this loss of faith and the declining interest many
Americans now show in seeking a better future through education and job
performance.
This blog collects information about income inequality and places it – available to anyone interested – with alphabetical reference, on this specifically linked, Internet-accessible-and-searchable blog database, access to which is free and unrestricted. Search by keyword, i.e., Smith, poverty, using Microsoft Command f.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Gateway to Sources and Information About Income Inequality in the United States
Millions of Americans are working longer hours for lower wages, and yet almost all of the new income and wealth being created is going to the top one percent. While the top one percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall.
Scholars, from the Nobel-Prize-winning Paul Krugman to the widely respected economist James Surowiecki, have been working to analyze these disparities. Americans are not generally aware of the extent of this income inequality. In most developed countries, there is a direct relationship between income inequality and the public's views about the need to address the issue – but not in America, where income inequality is worse but the concern is lower. The most commonly accepted measurement of income inequality, the Gini Index, ranks the United States sixth-worst among 173 nations.
Private-equity companies are far more obviously connected to an undue concentration of wealth at the expense of workers and communities than are collateralized-debt obligations, which were at the core of our 2008 Great Recession. Within the one percent, there is a top one percent that consists disproportionately of private-equity and hedge-fund principals.
POOR ARE LOSING CONFIDENCE
Too little attention is being paid to new
analyses showing that people of all racial and ethnic groups are losing
confidence in the core American principle that hard work is a means to
upward mobility. This will have long-term economic costs as
low-income Americans increasingly see few benefits of education or hard
work for themselves and their children.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
CENSUS BUREAU REPORT TELLS LITTLE ABOUT POVERTY
[The Census Bureau's annual Official
Poverty Measure] tells the public little about how materially deprived the poor
are, how much income they actually have, how reduced their children’s chances
are of developing skills for climbing into the middle class, or, most
important, how many truly poor there are in America.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
43 MILLION IN POVERTY
In
2015, the last year for which data are available, 43.1 million people—13.5 percent of the population—were considered to be in poverty, defined as falling below an
annual income threshold of $24,257 for a family of four.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
POVERTY RATE IS HIGH NOW
The poverty rate has been as low as 11.1
percent in the 1970s; it rose under Ronald Reagan to approximately 15 percent
and then fell to about 13 percent before rising again, then fell again under
Bill Clinton to 11.3 percent before rising in the 2000s.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
SOME FALL BELOW POVERTY LINE SEASONALLY
Census Bureau measures tell us nothing useful about
the growing number of people whose average incomes are above the poverty line
but who often fall under it for several months of the year. According to one
sample, 94 percent of those who earn between 100 and 150
percent of the poverty line are officially poor for at least one month, for
example.
"America: The Forgotten Poor," Jeff Madrick, New
York Review of Books, June 22, 2017, pp. 49-50.
Monday, April 3, 2017
FOR POOREST, INCOME GROWTH NEAR ZERO
“In recent years, trends in average living standards interacted with rising income inequality to produce stagnant
wages in the lower and middle income groups.
. . . since 2000, the decline in average income growth was further
exacerbated for the lowest income groups by a declining share of the total. So, for the
bottom
fifth,
the growth in real income declined from 3 percent . . . to essentially zero in the last fifteen
years. Of this catastrophic decline, about half was due to the slower overall
growth, while half was due to rising inequality.”
William D. Nordhaus, “Why Growth Will Fall, New York
Review of Books, August 18, 2016, page 66.
Friday, October 21, 2016
MULTI-MILLIONAIRE
SEES REVOLUTION COMING
Multi-millionaire
Nick Hanauer is no
dummy. He sees the writing on the wall.
“And what do
I see in our future now?
“I see pitchforks.
“At the
same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any
plutocrats in history, the rest of the country — the 99.99 percent — is lagging far behind. The divide between the haves and
have-nots is getting worse really, really fast. In 1980, the top one percent
controlled about 8 percent of U.S. national income. The bottom half shared
about 18 percent. Today, the top 1 percent [of the U.S. population] share about
20 percent; the bottom half, just 12 percent.
“But the
problem isn’t that we have inequality. Some inequality is intrinsic to
any high-functioning capitalist economy. The problem is that inequality is at
historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly
becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society. Unless our
policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be
back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.
“And so I have a
message for my fellow filthy rich, for all of us who live in our gated bubble
worlds: Wake up, people. It won’t last.
“No society
can sustain this kind of rising inequality. In fact, there is no example in
human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didn’t
eventually come out. You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you
a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counter-examples. None. It’s not
if, it’s when.
Nick Hanauer, “The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us
Plutocrats,” Politico Magazine "The pitchforks are coming . . . for us
Plutocrats"
Saturday, September 3, 2016
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS
One-percenters like Boeing, Northrup-Grumman, and Lockeed Martin have charged the government billons of dollars for post-911 safety projects. Read Steven Brill’s deeply incisive article in the September 2016 issue of The Atlantic magazine at http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/backissues/ page 61.
Steven Brill, “Are We Any Safer?” The Atlantic, September 2016.
Saturday, July 23, 2016
PEW
SURVEY SHOWS NEAR-UNIVERSAL INCOME LOSSES
Households in all
economic tiers experienced near-universal decreases in median incomes across
U.S. metropolitan areas, according to the independent Pew Foundation’s Research
Center. Middle-income households lost
ground financially in 222 of 229 metropolitan areas from 1999 to 2014.
Meanwhile, those in the lower-income tier saw their median income slip in 221
areas and those in the upper-income households took a financial hit in 215
areas.
Pew
Research Center 2014 American Community Survey
MIDWEST HAS TOP 10 MIDDLE-CLASS AREAS
The 10 metropolitan
areas with the greatest shares of middle-income adults are located mostly in
the Midwest, according to the independent Pew Foundation’s Research Center.
Metropolitan areas with the largest upper-income shares are
mostly in the Northeast or on the California coast, while the 10 metropolitan areas with the biggest
lower-income tiers are in the southwest, several on the border with Mexico.
Pew
Research Center 2014 American Community Survey
Friday, July 15, 2016
TRUMP’S WHITE WORKING-CLASS SUPPORTERS
[Donald] Trump’s
white working class supporters — who
provide somewhere between 58 percent and 62 percent of his votes, according to data from NBC and
ABC polls — have suffered a stunning loss of
relative status over the past 40 years. Their
wages have stagnated or declined; the ascendance of minorities has threatened
their cultural dominance; and the growth of an increasingly large and affluent
upper middle class has pushed goods and services once viewed as theirs by right
beyond their reach.
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
MANY ESSENTIAL EXPENDITURES
HAVE BECOME UNAFFORDABLE
For those in the bottom third of the income
distribution,
even essential expenditures have become unaffordable: the $7,000 to $10,000 average cost of a
funeral, the $33,865 average cost of a new car, the $18,000 average annual cost
of child care.
Crucially important is the fact that rising inequality constitutes a double
whammy. It raises the cost of sought-after goods and it increases the economic
gap between the working class and the affluent, spurring nostalgia for what was
(even if what was really wasn’t).
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
WEALTHY PULLED THE RUG OUT
“In effect, the increase in the resources commandeered by the overclass has pulled the rug
out from under the once upwardly mobile white working class.”
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
WEALTHY
CAN BID UP THE PRICES
Thomas
Edsall, writing in the New York Times, noted: “Growing income inequality in the U.S. has meant that, as
those at the top are able bid up the price of valued goods like
housing and access to good schools, those in lower groups
have struggled to maintain their positions.” [quoting an essay
titled, “Keeping Up With the Joneses,” presented at the annual meeting of the
American Sociological Association by Neil
Fligstein, a professor of sociology at Berkeley, Pat Hastings, a Ph.D.
candidate at Berkeley, and Adam Goldstein, a professor of sociology at
Princeton University.]
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
NO MONEY FOR A CAR REPAIR BILL
A May 2015 Federal Reserve report provides a
window into the financial condition of many in the working class. It found that
47
percent of Americans do not have the resources to cover a $400 bill for such
unanticipated costs as a car repair or a health emergency. They would
be forced to borrow from friends or family, to sell something, to go to a
payday loan company or to add to their credit card debt.
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
U.S. MEDIAN INCOME IS $53,567
In July 2014, USA Today
estimated that in the United States, where the median household
income was $53,567, the minimum annual cost of living the American
dream was $130,357.
Thomas B. Edsall, “How Falling Behind the Joneses Fueled the
Rise of Trump,” New York Times, July 7, 2016, Opinion Pages.
BRITISH EXIT FROM EUROPEAN UNION RATTLES WEALTHY
A measure of consumer
sentiment dropped sharply in July, as wealthy Americans
were rattled by a decision by the U.K. to leave the European
Union. The University of Michigan
said . . . its consumer sentiment index
fell to 89.5 in July, a three-month low, from 93.5 in June. Economists polled
by MarketWatch anticipated a reading of 92.5.
Fidelity
Alerts, July 15, 2016
Monday, May 23, 2016
FORMER
UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT’S ADVISER NOW PLAYS SAME ROLE FOR TRUMP
“In
December 2013 Russian leaders made
financial aid to [Ukrainian President Viktor]
Yanukovych’s government contingent upon clearing
the streets of protestors. The government’s subsequent escalation of
repression – first the suspension of the rights to assembly and free expression
in January 2014, and then the mass shooting of
protestors in February – turned the popular movement into a
revolution. On February 22 [2014], Yanukovych fled to Russia. (Two years later,
his political strategist, Paul Manafort,
would resurface in the US, playing the same role for [billionaire presidential
candidate] Donald Trump.)”
Timothy Snyder, “The Wars of Vladimir Putin,” New York Review
of Books, June 9, 2016. Timothy Snyder is the Housum Professsor of History
at Yale University. His most recent book is Black Earth: The Holocaust as
History and Warning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)